Shifting cultivation
is considered to be an important cause of degradation and carbon emissions
in tropical dry forests. Under REDD+,
two sets of solutions have been proposed:
(1) switching to permanent cultivation (sedentarization
and intensification of production, to allow ´sparing´ of some forest) and
(2)
lengthening of the fallow cycles, to allow more time for recuperation of
stocks.
In
InfoBrief 4, which can be downloaded from the side menu, we calculate the carbon
emissions that would result from production of one tonne of maize in shifting cultivation
and compare this to emissions in a permanent cultivation system. We find that emissions from loss of biomass under
shifting cultivation are higher than in permanent agriculture, but this does not
take into account the much higher inputs of carbon in the form of agro-chemicals
and energy in permanent agriculture.
We then calculate
the impacts of shortening and lengthening the fallow cycle. We find that contrary to common perceptions,
in many cases shortening of the cycles increases
standing carbon stocks across the affected landscape and reduces emissions.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario