The drafts
for the Paris agreement and the decisions relating to it, as drawn up in Bonn
last week, are full of square brackets, that is, text which is not yet agreed
upon. REDD+ is included (Article 3bis),
but an alternative, non-results based mechanism (´Joint Mitigation and
Adaptation Mechanism´, JMA) is also on the table. There remains a vast amount of negotiating to
do in Paris before global agreement is reached and REDD+, in whatever form, can
be brought under an umbrella agreement which tackles climate change
comprehensively, inclusively and effectively.
In the hope
and expectation that there will be a successful outcome in Paris, we are
initiating this blog to share the results of research work on REDD+ that has
been carried out by CIGA, the Centro de Investigaciones en Geografía Ambiental
of the Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, at its Morelia campus. We deal mostly with nitty-gritty practicalities
that are involved in getting successful national REDD+ programmes off the
ground.
In the coming
weeks we will be posting on this site a series of InfoBriefs prepared for
presentation at CoP21 in Paris. These
highlight some of the practical problems and solutions related to implementing
national REDD+ programmes. In addition
we are co-hosting a side event at the CoP, together with the Global Canopy
Programme, CCBA and University of Twente, on community monitoring for REDD, and
arranging a meeting on the potential of Tropical Dry Forests under REDD+
(please see announcements to the right of this blog). You are welcome, if you are going to be at
CoP21 in Paris.
InfoBrief 3
can be downloaded immediately. It deals
with the challenge of estimating emissions from forest degradation, for the
particular case of Tropical Dry Forests (TDF).
In general, TDF has a higher population density than rainforest, and it
is used quite intensively in the livelihood strategies of the local
people. While deforestation may
certainly be taking place in patches, we argue that the greater problem is
degradation, which is occurring more or less all over. In the case of Mexico, degradation of TDF is mainly
the result of cattle grazing in forests, and to a lesser extent as a result of
shifting cultivation. There is no doubt
of the importance of tackling this source of emissions, but the first challenge
is how to measure it.
Over the
next couple of weeks we will raise other issues, such as the impacts of
shifting cultivation on emissions and its opportunity costs. We
hope this will be of interest of others and urge you to respond.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario